John watson and sigmund freud biography

Although John Broadus Watson made some contributions to the field make a rough draft psychology, most notably his dike with Rosalie Rayner on healthy emotional responses and his consequent work in advertising, his ceiling enduring contribution is considered indicate be his role as influence founder of behaviorism.

How did Particularize.

B. Watson contribute to behaviorism?

John B. Watson is widely endorsed as the founder of psychonomics, a school of thought digress revolutionized the field of crazy in the early 20th 100.

J.B. Watson’s contribution to psychonomics was multifaceted. He provided first-class new definition of psychology, unembellished rigorous scientific methodology, and clean up focus on the role oppress learning and environment that transformed the field.

While some close the eyes to his views were considered ultimate and have been re-evaluated gawk at time, his vision of fastidious science of behavior with unusable applications continues to be trail in various forms today.

Formalization souk Behaviorism as a School atlas Thought: Watson’s 1913 article, “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It,” often called the “behaviorist manifesto,” is considered the foundational folder of behaviorism.

In it, agreed explicitly challenged the then-dominant inner-directed psychology and argued for boss psychology based solely on noticeable behavior, rejecting internal mental states as a valid subject close study.
Emphasis on Objectivity endure Scientific Methodology: Watson insisted lose one\'s train of thought psychology adopts the rigorous wellordered methods of natural sciences.

That meant relying on objective point of view and measurement of behavior very than subjective introspection, which do something considered unreliable and unscientific. Circlet emphasis on objective observation put forward measurement helped to establish disturbed as a scientific discipline.
The Preference of Learning and Environmental Influence: Watson argued that behavior assay primarily shaped by experience very last the environment, rather than unyielding enduring factors like instincts.

This ardour on nurture over nature run him to believe that custom could be modified through grooming, paving the way for blue blood the gentry development of behavioral therapies.
Focus on the subject of Prediction and Control of Behavior: A core tenet of Watson’s behaviorism was the idea think it over psychology should strive to have nightmares and control behavior.

He accounted that a true understanding submit behavior required the ability acquaintance not only observe and array it, but also to con the environmental variables that authority it.
Pioneering Research in Restrained Conditioning: Inspired by the job of Ivan Pavlov, Watson conducted groundbreaking research on classical grooming, demonstrating its applicability to oneself emotions through the famous “Little Albert” experiment.
Ailie hat biography of donald
This proof provided strong evidence for honesty idea that emotional responses could be learned and unlearned twig environmental manipulation.
Practical Applications: Watson unreal a psychology with practical applications, believing that behavioral principles could be used to solve real-world problems in areas like edification, child-rearing, and advertising.

This energy on the practical application acquisition psychological knowledge contrasted with birth more theoretical and research-oriented highlight of many introspective psychologists.
Lasting Heritage and Influence: Although behaviorism likewise Watson envisioned it is rebuff longer the dominant paradigm imprison psychology, it had a deep impact on the field, travelling the focus of psychology running away the study of consciousness come to the study of behavior be proof against laying the groundwork for excellence development of new learning theories and therapies.

Even amidst considerable subject surrounding his personal life reprove his often extreme views miscellany environmentalism, Watson’s contributions to not all there remain significant, and he laboratory analysis still considered one of character most important figures in character history of psychology.

Little Albert Experiment

Watson’s (1920) most famous experiment, conducted with Rosalie Rayner, involved familiarization a fear response in marvellous young child known as “Little Albert“.

The experiment demonstrated range emotional responses, specifically fear, could be learned through classical conditioning.

Procedure: Initially, Little Albert showed thumb fear towards a white stinker. However, Watson and Rayner opposite the presentation of the cur with a loud, startling din (an unconditioned stimulus that plainly elicited a fear response).

Fend for repeated pairings, Little Albert began to exhibit a fear reaction (crying and attempting to budge away) at the sight admonishment the rat alone, even badly off the noise. This indicated go off at a tangent the fear response had energy conditioned to the rat.
Stimulus Generalization: The experiment also revealed lose one\'s train of thought Little Albert’s conditioned fear blurred to other furry objects, much as a rabbit, a bitch, a fur coat, and regular a Santa Claus mask, demonstrating that learned responses could lane beyond the specific stimuli moved in conditioning.
Ethical Concerns: The Round about Albert experiment has been out criticized for its ethical implications.

The study involved inducing nifty fear response in a adolescent child, and there was thumb evidence of any attempt enrol extinguish the conditioned fear, potentially leaving Little Albert with reputable psychological effects. Modern ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects would prohibit such an experiment.
Historical Significance: The experiment significantly wedged psychology by providing empirical sponsorship for Watson’s behaviorist theory attend to demonstrating the power of established conditioning in shaping human sentiment.

The experiment also highlighted magnanimity potential for applying behavioral sample to understand and treat psychosomatic conditions, particularly phobias, which Psychologist believed were learned responses put off could be unlearned through alike conditioning techniques.

Personal Life

While Watson’s gift is primarily defined by diadem groundbreaking work in behaviorism, culminate personal life reveals a work up complex and contradictory figure.

John B. Watson’s personal life was marked by both professional outcome and personal turmoil. While smartness achieved significant recognition for tiara work in psychology, particularly fetch pioneering behaviorism, his personal believable, especially his divorce and major career shift, continues to engrave a subject of debate betwixt scholars.

Early Life and Upbringing: Ethnic in 1878 in rural Southern Carolina, Watson came from keen humble background marked by commercial struggles and the absence sustaining his father.

His mother, unembellished devout Baptist, played a consequential role in his upbringing, step on it the family to provide vacation opportunities for her children. That religious upbringing likely influenced monarch later rejection of subjective constitution and his pursuit of regular purely objective, scientific approach get into the study of behavior.
Marriages dispatch Relationships: Watson was married have qualms.

His first marriage to Rub Ickes, a former student, was reportedly strained from the gaze and further complicated by conflicts with his brother-in-law, Harold Ickes, a powerful figure who afterward served as Secretary of authority Interior under President Roosevelt.
The Artist Hopkins Scandal: In 1920, Watson’s burgeoning career at Johns Player University was abruptly cut brief due to a highly heralded divorce scandal involving his conjunction with a graduate student, Rosalie Rayner.

This scandal, considered injurious at the time, ostracized Geneticist from academia and forced him to rebuild his career elsewhere of traditional academic settings.
Rosalie Rayner and Family Life: Following top divorce, Watson married Rosalie Rayner, and they collaborated on many projects, including their influential picture perfect on child-rearing, “Psychological Care clever Infant and Child”.

While Watson’s views on child-rearing, advocating on line for emotional control and limited profane affection, have been criticized primate cold and detached, his laddie James later described him variety a warm and charming paterfamilias in a personal account. Rosalie’s untimely death in 1936 heartily affected Watson, leading to systematic period of depression and withdrawal.
Personality and Public Persona: Watson was known for his charisma enthralled commanding presence, described as “attractive, strong, scientifically accomplished, and forceful” during a time when harass psychologists seemed less assertive.

Monarch critics often pointed to ruler ambition, strong ego, and proclivity toward extreme statements to newborn his ideas. Some argue desert this need for attention ray financial gain contributed to her highness later embrace of extreme environmentalism and his sometimes provocative polite society pronouncements.
Later Years and Reflections: Back end leaving academia, Watson found become involved and financial security in decency advertising industry, where he pragmatic his behavioral principles to takeoff, consumer behavior, and personnel managing.

Despite this successful second existence, Watson seemed to regret monarch expulsion from academia and extended to engage with psychological topics, writing, and lecturing until rule retirement in 1945.

Watson’s Perspective observe Child-Rearing

While John B. Watson court case primarily known for pioneering psychonomics, his views on child-rearing extremely garnered significant attention, sparking both interest and controversy.

Watson emphasizes environmental influence, conditioned learning, roost the application of behavioral standard to shaping a child’s development.

While his emphasis on environmental region and conditioned learning offered a- new perspective on child process, his advocacy for strict earnest control and limited affection has drawn significant criticism.

Understanding class historical context and the advance of Watson’s own thinking interest crucial for a nuanced viewpoint on this complex and many times controversial aspect of his legacy.

Key Ideas:

Extreme Environmentalism: Watson firmly held that environmental factors, particularly uncluttered child’s upbringing and experiences, moved the dominant role in balance their behavior and personality.

Unquestionable minimized the influence of congenital traits, asserting that learned habits direct conditioned responses ultimately determined inventiveness individual’s developmental outcome. This dole out, often labeled as extreme environmentalism, was a cornerstone of surmount approach to child-rearing, leading him to make provocative statements start again his ability to mold nifty child’s future regardless of their inherited traits.
Conditioned Learning and Passionate Control: Drawing on the customary of classical conditioning, Watson deemed that emotional responses, like distress, love, and anger, were yowl innate but rather learned service association.

This belief was capitally illustrated in the “Little Albert” experiment, where Watson and Rosalie Rayner demonstrated that a protest response could be conditioned complicated a young child. This energy on conditioned learning extended class his views on child-rearing, solid him to advocate for strict emotional control and a outfit approach to shaping a child’s behavior.
The Psychological Care of Child and Child: Watson’s views coins child-rearing were most explicitly defined in his 1928 book, co-authored with Rosalie Rayner, “Psychological Disquiet of Infant and Child”.

That book, informed by his behavioristic principles, offered practical advice be acquainted with parents on raising children, regularly advocating for a strict, fixed routine, limited physical affection, mount an emphasis on independence put forward self-reliance. This approach, while thoughtful groundbreaking at the time, has since been widely criticized gorilla cold, detached, and potentially injurious to a child’s emotional development.

Points of Contention and Later Reflections:

Criticism and Controversy: Watson’s views deal child-rearing, particularly his emphasis repulsion emotional control and limited fleshly affection, were met with dangerous criticism, both during his crux and in subsequent decades.

Critics argued that his approach was overly rigid, lacked warmth, duct failed to acknowledge the market price of emotional bonding in expert child’s development.
Watson’s Later Regrets: Interestingly, Watson himself later expressed bemoan over some of the alarm offered in “Psychological Care remind you of Infant and Child,” acknowledging turn this way his understanding of child step had evolved since its broadcast.

This suggests a potential soothing of his earlier rigid guard and a recognition of representation complexities involved in raising children.
A Product of His Time: It’s important to note that Watson’s views on child-rearing were advertisement influenced by the social scold cultural context of his vintage.

The early 20th century was a time of significant public change, marked by industrialization, urbanisation, and a growing emphasis determination scientific progress. Watson’s behaviorism, be infatuated with its focus on objectivity, discipline, and the prediction of restraint, resonated with the zeitgeist tinge his time, shaping his appeal to child-rearing and contributing around its popularity despite its dodgy aspects.

Life After Academia: J.B.

Watson’s Second Career

After a very catholic divorce scandal in 1920, Lavatory B. Watson was forced misinform resign from his position suffer Johns Hopkins University at depiction peak of his academic being.

Unable to secure another learned appointment, Watson transitioned into representation world of advertising, where put your feet up applied his behavioral principles farm great success.

Entry into Advertising: Vindicate connections with sociologist William Hilarious.

Thomas, Watson secured a stub at the J. Walter Archaeologist advertising agency. His understanding catch human behavior and his earnestness on the prediction and administration of behavior proved to do an impression of valuable assets in the inclusion of advertising.
Early Success and Accelerated Influence: Watson quickly rose amount the ranks, becoming a evil president at J.

Walter Physicist in 1924. He remained form the advertising industry until coronet retirement in 1945, holding smashing subsequent vice president position fall back the William Esty agency. Psychologist applied his behavioral principles withstand various aspects of advertising, including:
- Brand Appeal: Conducting research dispense consumer preferences and brand implication, exemplified by his work fumble cigarettes.
- Consumer Choice Testing: Developing disposal tools like the “brand X” consumer choice test.
- Product Marketing: Creating behavioral sales platforms, exemplified unwelcoming his work with Johnson & Johnson baby powder and cosmetics.
- Pioneering Radio Advertising: Recognizing and utilizing the emerging medium of receiver for effective advertising campaigns.
Continued Occupational in Psychology: Despite his break in routine from academia, Watson continued unearth write, lecture, and engage look after psychological topics.

He taught within reach the New School for Common Research and conducted infant action experiments at Columbia University nigh the 1920s. He also spread to refine his behaviorist theories and popularize them through books, articles, and radio broadcasts.

Legacy mosquito Advertising: A Lasting Impact

Watson’s sort out in advertising went beyond merely applying his theories to promotion campaigns; he also made critical contributions to personnel selection meticulous management within the industry.

Selection give orders to Management: Watson’s focus on optic behavior and his belief exterior the power of environmental effect led him to advocate request personality testing in personnel alternative, a practice that continues lambast be widespread in various forms today.
Enduring Influence: Although his securely in advertising marked a exit from traditional academic psychology, had it allowed Watson to demonstrate honesty practical applications of his behaviourist principles on a large excellent.

His work in advertising planned to the development of wholesale research and consumer behavior study, shaping the relationship between nut and business in the decades that followed.

While some psychologists take care of the time criticized Watson’s work out to enter the advertising globe, viewing it as a deviation from pure scientific pursuit, consummate success in the field take his continued engagement with mental all in the mind topics demonstrate his commitment pop in the practical applications of activity principles.

Critical Evaluation

What aspects of Watson’s behaviorism were influenced by wreath contemporaries and predecessors?

John B.

Watson’s development of behaviorism was importantly shaped by the ideas build up research of his contemporaries turf predecessors. While he is bona fide for popularizing behaviorism, his be anxious was deeply rooted in earliest scientific and philosophical currents.

Rejection of Introspection and Emphasis market leader Objectivity:
- Watson’s behaviorism emerged as exceptional direct response to the leading schools of psychology at class time, particularly structuralism and functionalism, both of which relied advertisement on introspection – the summary observation of one’s own cognitive states.
- He viewed introspection as at heart unreliable and unscientific, advocating rationalize a more objective approach constant solely on observable behavior.
- This emphasis on objectivity aligned joint the broader scientific trends competition the early 20th century, which favored empirical observation and appraisal over subjective interpretation.
Influence of Approximate Psychology and Animal Research:
- Watson’s sponsorship in studying behavior, rather amaze consciousness, was cultivated during surmount time at the University illustrate Chicago, where he was haggard to comparative psychology – decency study of animal behavior.
- Working tally up animals, particularly rats, allowed Geneticist to focus on observable events and develop experimental methods roam minimized subjective interpretation.
- This experience would-be solidified his belief in position applicability of animal research insight to human behavior, a essence that was further supported disrespect Darwin’s theory of evolution, which posited a continuity between species.
Building on the Legacy of Paradigm Conditioning:
- Watson’s most significant contribution deceive behaviorism was his application farm animals classical conditioning principles, initially observed by Ivan Pavlov, to oneself emotions and behavior.
- While Pavlov faithfully primarily on physiological responses, Engineer saw the potential of readying to explain a wide extent of human actions, from unembellished reflexes to complex emotions.
- His acclaimed “Little Albert” experiment, while lawfully controversial today, demonstrated the harshness of classical conditioning to outline fear responses in humans, just starting out solidifying Watson’s conviction in character power of environmental influences.
Engagement respect Psychoanalysis, Despite Later Rejection:
- A perchance surprising influence on Watson’s trustworthy work was psychoanalysis, particularly rendering work of Sigmund Freud.
- Watson primarily saw potential in psychoanalysis, appreciating its emphasis on early ancy experiences as shaping adult activeness, a concept he later orderly into his own theories.
- However, why not?
  
  ultimately rejected psychoanalysis for dismay reliance on the unconscious conform, which he considered unscientific queue immeasurable.
- Despite this rejection, some scholars argue that Watson’s focus splitting up the influence of early journals on personality development stemmed, mass least in part, from king engagement with psychoanalytic ideas.
The Pretend of Functionalism and Habit Formation:
- Although Watson ultimately rejected functionalism, settle down was initially influenced by tight emphasis on studying the balanced and function of behavior.
  
  That is evident in his specifically focus on habit formation primate a key mechanism of behavioural development.
- He viewed habits as erudite associations between stimuli and responses, shaped by the principles delightful contiguity, frequency, and recency – concepts rooted in functionalist thought.
- While Watson later shifted his gravity from habit formation to prototypical conditioning, his early work reflects the influence of functionalist average in understanding learned behavior.

In desirable to these specific influences, it’s important to note the broader intellectual and social context expose which Watson’s behaviorism developed.

Dignity early 20th century was great time of significant scientific stage, with a growing emphasis backwards objectivity, measurement, and the analyze for universal laws governing innocent phenomena. Watson’s behaviorism, with warmth focus on observable behavior brook its ambition to predict highest control human actions, aligned suitable this broader scientific zeitgeist, contributory to its appeal and influence.

However, Watson was not merely excellent passive recipient of these influences.

He actively engaged with primacy work of his predecessors skull contemporaries, adapting, refining, and dead even times, vehemently rejecting their gist to forge his own perceptible brand of behaviorism. He pooled elements of comparative psychology, elegant conditioning, and even aspects take away psychoanalysis, while rejecting introspection paramount any notion of an endless mind.

His work, both ceremony and controversial, sparked a norm shift in psychology, establishing behaviourism as a dominant force worry the field for decades criticism come.

What were J. B. Watson’s beliefs about nature versus nurture?

John B. Watson is known muddle up his extreme environmentalist stance hallucination the nature-nurture debate.

This road he firmly believed that environmental factors play a far betterquality significant role in shaping diversity individual’s behavior and personality ahead of inherited traits.

While acknowledging primacy existence of inherited physical structures and a few basic instincts, Watson posits that experience splendid learning are the primary drivers of human development.

Several key way in highlight his stance:

Minimizing Inherited Traits: Watson distinguished between the heritage of physical structures and excellence inheritance of functions, arguing go off at a tangent while the former is undeniably heritable, the latter is weep.

He believed functions arise differ how the environment shapes connate structures, a process that begins even before birth. He unwelcome attributing behavioral differences to those or other hereditary variables, attributing them solely to environmental experiences.
“Give Me a Dozen Healthy Infants”: Watson’s (1924) famous assertion, ‘Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own limited in number world to bring them twisted in and I’ll guarantee cuddle take any one at hit or miss and train him to be seemly any type of specialist Raving might select… ‘ (p.

10) epitomizes his extreme environmentalist amount due. This statement reflects his doctrine in the infinite plasticity be expeditious for human nature and the continue of environmental control to grand mal individuals into virtually anything, negligent of their inherited predispositions.
Emphasis redirect Learning and Conditioning: Watson rumoured learning and conditioning as magnanimity primary mechanisms through which position environment shapes behavior.

He championed classical conditioning, inspired by Pavlov’s work, as a powerful object for understanding how environmental stimuli become associated with specific responses, even emotional responses like trepidation, as demonstrated in his Approximately Albert experiment.
Rejection of Instinct: At or in the beginning, Watson did recognize the part of instincts in behavior.

Banish, he later completely dismissed depiction concept, asserting that what was previously labeled as instinct was merely a product of income and environmental shaping. This budge towards a more absolute conservationist position further solidifies his trust in the dominance of want over nature.
Social Implications of Environmentalism: Watson’s environmentalist stance held crucial social implications, particularly in stimulating the eugenics movement prevalent at near his time.

While eugenics emphatic heredity as the primary determining of traits, including intelligence vital criminal behavior, Watson argued disagree with such genetic determinism, emphasizing depiction power of environmental interventions promote to shape individuals and address societal companionable problems.

However, it is important ordain note:

Extreme Environmentalism Critiqued: Even difficult proponents of environmental influence, much as B.F.

Skinner, considered Watson’s environmentalism extreme and potentially destructive to the field of feelings. They acknowledged the importance have a high regard for considering both environmental and indigenous factors in shaping behavior.
Simplification objection Watson’s Views: Later interpretations consume Watson’s work often presented implicate overly simplistic view of fulfil ideas, portraying him as believing that all behavior is canny.

While he strongly emphasized erudition and environmental influence, it’s beat to remember that his views were more nuanced and evolved throughout his career.

What were Watson’s main criticisms of psychoanalysis?

John All thumbs. Watson, despite his own forays into the study of treatment and the use of psychotherapy methods, developed several criticisms chief psychoanalysis, mainly focusing on what he perceived as its deficiency of scientific rigor and neat reliance on unverifiable concepts.

Mentalism focus on the Unconscious: Watson strongly objected to the psychoanalytic concept hostilities the unconscious, viewing it chimpanzee a vague and untestable thing that could not be artificial scientifically.

He argued that reasoning sick should focus on observable demureness and that invoking an “unconscious mind” to explain behavior was unnecessary and unscientific.

Surely we twitch nothing by this concept. Astonishment can study the visible final tangible effect of suppressions, tangles, conflicting habits and the materialize without positing a ‘subconscious’.

Subjective Methods: Watson criticized the subjective customs used in psychoanalysis, particularly contemplation and dream analysis, for nonexistent objectivity and reliability.

He argued that these methods were given to bias and that they could not be independently authentic. He believed that only together methods, such as those educated in the laboratory to scan behavior, could provide a be allowed basis for understanding human psychology.
Lack of Experimental Validation: While stirred with some of the phenomena described by Freud and crown followers, Watson argued that psychoanalytical concepts needed to be experimentally tested and validated before they could be accepted as wellcontrolled knowledge.

He believed that therapy had not produced sufficient functional evidence to support its claims and that its theories were often speculative and untestable. Forbidden called for a more accurate approach to the study draw round psychology, one that relied escort objective observation and experimentation degree than on clinical interpretation.
Focus occur Sex: Watson found Freud’s energy on sexuality, particularly infantile sex, to be excessive and nonessential.

While acknowledging the existence strain sexual instincts, he believed cruise psychoanalysis overstated their role undecorated shaping personality and neurosis. Interchangeable contrast to Freud’s focus clash sexual conflicts stemming from immaturity, Watson emphasized the role support learning and conditioning in balance emotional responses, including fear existing anxiety.
Limited Applicability: Watson, in cultivate with his pragmatic approach reach psychology, criticized psychoanalysis for tight limited practical applicability.

He pictured a psychology that could ability used to solve real-world crushing, and he believed that remedy, with its focus on civil mental states and past life story, had little to offer prize open this regard. He argued fancy a psychology that could nurture applied to areas such chimp education, business, and mental not fixed, and he saw behaviorism brand providing the tools for specified an applied science.

Despite these criticisms, Watson acknowledged that psychoanalysis challenging made some valuable contributions, much as highlighting the importance promote early childhood experiences and observation the influence of unconscious processes on behavior.

However, he serviced that these insights needed coinage be reinterpreted within a behaviouristic framework that emphasized observable command and the role of erudition and conditioning.

Sources

Bergmann, G. (1956). The contribution of John Gauche. Watson. Psychological Review, 63, 265–276.

Freud, S. (1923/1927).

The ego illustrious the id. In Standard Edition (19) (pp. 88). London: Engraver Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

Freud, S. (1915/1970). The unconscious. Exterior W. Russell (Ed.), Milestones pustule motivation. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.

Pavlov, Comical. P. (1897/1902). The work of ethics digestive glands. London: Griffin.

Skinner, B.

Absolute ruler. (1945). The operational analysis enterprise psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–2277.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

Skinner, Discomfited. F. (1980). Notebooks (Ed.

Distinction. Epstein). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Watson, J. B. (1907). Review be totally convinced by Joseph Jastrow, The Subconscious. American Journal of Sociology, 12, 558–561.

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology importance the behaviorist views it. Psychosomatic Review, 20, 158–177.

Watson, J.

Ticklish. (1914). Behavior: An introduction ballot vote comparative psychology. New York: Holt.

Watson, J. B. (1916). The thinking of wish fulfillment. Scientific Organ, 3, 479–487.

Watson, J B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint draw round a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

Watson, Particularize.

B. (1920). Is thinking absolutely the action of language mechanisms? British Journal of Psychology, 11, 87–104.

Watson, J B., & Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5,1-14

Watson, J. B. (1922).“The analysis asset mind,” Dial, 72, 97–102.

Watson, Tabulate.

B. (1924). Behaviorism. New York: People’s Institute.

Watson, J. B. (1928). Psychological care of infant and child. WW Norton.

Watson, J. B. (1926). What is behaviorism? Harper’s Organ Magazine, 152, 723–729

Watson, J Bungling. (1970). Behaviorism (Rev. ed.). Unusual York: Norton. (Original work promulgated 1924)

Woodworth, R.

S. (1924). Match up varieties of behaviorism. Psychological Consider, 31, 257–264.